Transactional Legal Malpractice Cannot Be Shown By Speculative Better Deal

This summer’s decision by the Missouri Supreme Court in Nail v. Husch Blackwell Sanders illustrates the inherent difficulty a legal malpractice plaintiff faces when trying to prove causation in a transactional case.  In Nail, the court held that the plaintiff failed to show that, but for the law firm’s allegedly negligent drafting...

Transactional Legal Malpractice Cannot Be Shown By Speculative Better Deal Continue reading…

Missouri Supreme Court: At-Will Employment Not Sufficient Consideration for Arbitration Agreement

The Supreme Court of Missouri’s primary holding in a 4-3 decision last week in Baker v. Bristol Care, Inc., is that continuing at-will employment does not constitute consideration to make an arbitration agreement enforceable.  This holding may negatively impact some Missouri employers’ ability to enforce current arbitration agreements with...

Missouri Supreme Court: At-Will Employment Not Sufficient Consideration for Arbitration Agreement Continue reading…

Joint Employer Status with Temporary Employment Agency Under Missouri’s Minimum Wage Law

In Tolentino v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., the Supreme Court of Missouri held that an employer that contracts to receive employees from a temporary employment agency (“temporary agency”) may be held liable as a joint employer with that temporary agency for the temporary agency’s violation of...

Joint Employer Status with Temporary Employment Agency Under Missouri’s Minimum Wage Law Continue reading…

Requiring Employees to be “Positive and Professional” May Be Unlawful

On April 1, 2014, a panel of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) held that an employer’s policy that, among other things, required employees to “represent [the employer] in the community in a positive and professional manner in every opportunity” is unlawful.  Hills and Dales General Hospital, 360 NLRB No. 70.  The...

Requiring Employees to be “Positive and Professional” May Be Unlawful Continue reading…

Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (“GINA”) Case Settles for Over $100,000

In what it hails as the “first systemic case” under GINA, which was enacted in 2008, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced that it settled a case against a nursing and rehabilitation center that allegedly illegally asked applicants for family medical history as part of a post-offer pre-employment medical examination.  See EEOC...

Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (“GINA”) Case Settles for Over $100,000 Continue reading…

Announcement of Name Change and New Partner

Kohn, Shands, Elbert, Gianoulakis and Giljum, LLP
is now

Shands, Elbert, Gianoulakis & Giljum, LLP.


The Firm is also pleased to announce the election of

D. Leo Human


as...